Editor’s column: Magic Weekend cards highlight nearly impossible job for referees

Magic Weekend cards

If you’re sick of the inconsistencies relating to cards, bans and the disciplinary, spare a thought for the men in the middle.

Referees now face a near-impossible job to get things right, and are the ones that have to put up with the vitriol and criticism week in, week out.

No referee is perfect, but they are trying to do a job to the best of their ability – and without them, there is no game.

Magic Weekend provided two particular incidents of foul play that best reflected just how difficult managing the game has become.

OPTIONS: Where and when should Magic Weekend be in 2023?

Magic Weekend cards

Brad Singleton’s red card for Wigan against St Helens was the right decision. Even taking in to account that the spin of Curtis Sironen made him enter the tackle perhaps lower than Singleton was anticipating.

The issue was that if Sironen hadn’t stayed down to receive treatment, and/or if there wasn’t a big screen replay, play would have continued.

This is reflective on just how difficult it is for referees to see such incidents in the split second they happen live.

Singleton was positioned relatively naturally for a tackle, which then became a shoulder contact to the head as a result of both players’ positioning.

Sironen undoubtedly needed treatment because of the contact – but we surely can’t get to a point where foul play is only spotted if a player requires treatment, because that becomes open to abuse.

You don’t have to look far to find examples of players milking contact to try and get a review on televised matches.

Brad Singleton Matt Peet

A three-match ban for Singleton does seem a little harsh, but again this is reflective of how difficult it now is to judge what is foul play and what punishment will follow.

The simple description in the disciplinary notes says “reckless – tried to tackle but reckless about outcome”.

Hull derby crusher

The constant changing of the laws of the game has left them so open to interpretation, that inconsistencies and misunderstandings are inevitably commonplace.

It was a similar story in the Hull derby, where Brad Fash was yellow carded for a crusher tackle on Matt Parcell.

Parcell stayed down following the tackle, which also involved Scott Taylor, and the decision was then made following the replay – which was shown virtually seconds before Parcell was due to play the ball again.

There was no further punishment for the crusher tackle in the disciplinary, perhaps a pragmatic approach, particularly given the involvement of Taylor probably made it seem worse than it was.

But if those two incidents had happened in non-televised matches, the outcome might well have been different on the day.

There is a lot happening in the background with regards to player welfare and the ongoing litigation from former players that is undoubtedly impacting the disciplinary process.

Unfortunately, that doesn’t always help explain to fans new and existing just what is happening game to game.

There will be accidental contacts as a result of slips and twists and turns in the game. It appears we’re heading to a blanket punishment for whenever any sort of high contact happens. The challenge is how can the referees keep on top of every little awkward movement in every tackle and dish out consistent punishment.

The situation with the Match Review Panel – seemingly forensically analysing every single tackle – adds another element of frustration, which then gets taken out on the match officials.

They are criticised when they hand out too many cards, like the clamp down at the beginning of the year, yet then face abuse when not issuing them.

Either way, we’re now seeing bans handed out with alarming frequency and players spending too much time on the sideline.

It’s hard to see what the solution is. At the moment, I don’t think any of us can say with a great deal of conviction what the punishment might be for any given “bad” tackle – be that penalty, card or ban.

While understanding the player welfare issue, the nature of rugby league as a sport means that accidental “illegal” contact will be made from time to time. I’m not sure any sort of punishment can even stop that from happening.

I hope that doesn’t mean that rugby league will always be gripped by these constant disciplinary episodes and bans being dished out.

MORE: How the 2022 Magic Weekend attendance compares to previous years

About James Gordon 7129 Articles
Love Rugby League editor. Founded the website back in 2005. Worked with a range of clubs and sponsors during that time. Also commentates for BBC.


  1. Referees aren’t alone. They have two linesmen and at untelevised games two ingoal judges as well. One presumes these people are qualified referees, maybe not to the “high” standards the super League professional referees are, but they should know the rules.
    Problem is, every super League referee ignores the linesmen totally and then whines that he can’t see everything.
    When the game was played properly the linesmen watched for offside whilst the ref put eyes on the play the ball. If the linesman saw something, out goes the flag and he would stand there waiting. Once seen, play was brought back to that point and a penalty was awarded or scrum or whatever.
    If the linesmen are not there to watch the play for offences the ref might not see, why have them at all? Maybe you could ask a real referee like Fred Lindop.

    • We have touch judges in RL and it has never ever been part of their duties to watch for offside. You are confusing our game with soccer. The touch judge is the sole judge on matters of touch and touch in goal and can intervene on matters of foul play unseen by the referee. In this case the TJ will make the decision as to how the game is restarted. If it is for dismissal of the offender then the TJ submits the report. I know from being a match official and have officiated with Fred Lindop several times. Long time agon now bit I think the same protocol still applies.

  2. Linemen in super League ARE 1sr grade super League referees who are all nicked up the the main referee but I don’t know what they do will someone tell me? It’s even worse in Championship /league 1 the linemen need not be there they get money for nothing.Itx time for a FULL overall of referee/ linesmen responsibilities and have Ganson come and tell us what they are I have played and watched rugby league for 55 years plus and never saw such a shambles as it is now

  3. For me first question why in modern age do we not have Video Refs at every game. Wonder if Super league have explored a NRl type bunker set up. Football have it for VAR all replays and decision made from one off site location. I also like captain challenge idea in NRL. Refs can say to player I think it is fine, challenge it if you disagree.

  4. I’ve seen that the video refs take actions when not asked. If the ref purely wants to see the grounding. The video refs have taken the play back 4/5 moves looking for an infringement. Do only what is asked.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.