Trinity to take Wakefield Council to High Court

Wakefield Trinity are set to take Wakefield Council to the High Court as they hope to settle their dispute over the new community stadium.

In September, Trinity looked to be getting a new ground when the Council and the owners of Belle Vue (Beaumont Legal Stadium) agreed to redevelop the stadium rather than building a totally fresh stadium in Newmarket.

However, the Super League club recently refused to agree to the Council’s terms of the amount of rent.

And the Wakefield club have released a statement, with owners Michael Carter and Chris Brereton revealing that they will take the Council to the High Court to settle the dispute.

On, the statement read: “Six years ago, after three weeks of evidence, a Public Enquiry paid for by the ratepayers of Wakefield, concluded that a Community Stadium compliant to Super League standards should be built and funded by the planning gains which accrued to the property development of the Newmarket site adjacent to the M62.

“It was the duty of Wakefield Council, as the Local Planning Authority, to ensure that in return for the land coming out of the green belt, the Community Stadium was constructed.

“The Developer has its planning consent but not a brick has been laid on the Stadium site. We simply require the Council to fulfil its statutory duties.

“The Council now seeks to lay the blame for the mess which it has created, at the door of Wakefield Trinity.

“It should be borne in mind that a Labour controlled council has managed, as a result of the planning consents obtained by the developer, to line the pockets of a property speculator and has neglected to enforce the planning obligations due to its ratepayers, the Community at large, and of course, Wakefield Trinity Rugby League Club.

“The current proposal that we pay a commercial/reasonable rent (of which we have yet to see any detail or figures) for the new Community Stadium at Belle Vue is unacceptable.

“There is a legally binding obligation for the Council to provide a 99-year lease at a peppercorn yearly rental to the Wakefield & District Community Trust.

“The Trust in turn would create a lease to Wakefield Trinity, as anchor tenants, at a nominal rent to cover the Trust’s operating expenses.

“Wakefield Trinity would then enjoy the rewards from the Stadium, but would also be liable for all associated risks in operating a Stadium. This was and remains entirely acceptable.

“Unfortunately it is obvious from the attitude adopted by Wakefield Council that they are not prepared to help us secure the long term sustainable future for the Club. It was and remains entirely within the Council’s power to compel the developer at Newmarket to deliver the Stadium.

“The draft lease approved by the Planning Inspector and prepared earlier by the Councillor or the developers provides for a 99-year lease with no rent reviews at a peppercorn lease in favour of the Wakefield & District Community Trust. Why on earth would we now consider a rental at commercial rates?

“We are now preparing our case for presentation to the High Court. For reasons we know you (the fans) will understand.

“We have waited since June 2012 for the Council to deliver Newmarket Stadium. We are no nearer today then we were then!

“We have a duty to our fans and the City of Wakefield to ensure the long term survival and success of the Club.

“We will not be deterred by the unhelpful bullying by the Council and the developers at Newmarket or Belle Vue. We have no mandate or authority to accept anything less than the Community facilities promised at Newmarket on the legally binding terms set out in the Public Inquiry Planning decision.

“The findings of the Public Inquiry are a matter of public record. Do not rely on our interpretation of them. We have nothing to hide.

“Look for yourselves at the results on the government website. You will see where the blame lies for this farcical situation.

“The Club has been used as a Trojan Horse to secure planning gains for property developers which are worth millions of pounds and take land out of the green belt.

“Meanwhile the bargaining chip used to obtain the consents is nowhere near delivery.

“Finally, there are times when there is no alternative other than to stand and fight to enforce what we know to be our rights for the future of our great Club – Wakefield Trinity rather than to see it sacrificed on the altar of the Council and Developers greed.”


  1. I hope they succeed. I know a bit about this farce and the Council are a disgrace. The club is a community asset but the Council have no regard for its preservation. They have left the club high and dry without a ground.

  2. “Hear, hear” from a Cas fan. I fully support everything you say. Wakefield Council have ridden roughshod over greenbelt land all across the five towns in the pursuit of money. The councillors pay themselves £2000 per month in expenses. They are a disgrace and need exposing.

  3. Wakefield Council We have the worst sporing facility’s in the whole of the UK.
    Our town centre is just full of empty shops.
    Our new market to be pulled down after costing 4 million.
    The list is endless

  4. I have seen secret plans by Denise Jeffrey to take a dual carriageway across the Lock Lane sports field in Castleford so that she can then sell the land on that side of Castleford for development.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.